Use Los Angeles 3D inspection support, deviation visuals, and review notes to understand where a scan, part, or reconstructed model differs from the target.
Automotive scan
Deviation visualization
For visualizing how measured geometry differs from an agreed CAD or geometry reference.
A deviation view is only useful when the reference, alignment method, comparison band, regions of interest, and reporting purpose are understood before the result is generated.
Measured parts that need visual comparison against supplied CAD, reconstructed geometry, another scan, or an agreed nominal reference.
The part or scan data, reference CAD, relevant tolerance information, alignment intent, critical regions, and the decision the review must support.
Color-map images, aligned review views, selected notes, and agreed source files; certified reporting is not implied unless explicitly scoped.
Clear answers reduce quoting time and help keep the final files aligned with the real project need.
Measured scan data is aligned to agreed CAD or reference geometry and displayed as a color map or review view. It helps show where surfaces are above, below, or near the selected comparison band.
A meaningful comparison needs an agreed reference, such as supplied CAD, a reconstructed model, or another measured dataset. The alignment method and comparison objective are confirmed before analysis.
No. A visual deviation review is not automatically a certified dimensional inspection or accredited report. Any controlled measurement, reporting, traceability, or certification requirement must be explicitly reviewed and scoped.
Yes, when usable part data and reference CAD are available. The comparison can focus on overall form, selected interfaces, or agreed regions, with limitations documented in the handoff.
A typical handoff may include color-map images, aligned review views, selected notes, and the agreed measured or reference files. Exact outputs and tolerance bands are set during project review.
